THE POLICING OF FAMILIES. By Jacqztes Donzelot. New York: Random. House, , pp., $ (paperback). In this scholarly book, Donzelot. The Policing of Families(first published in French in [English edition, ]) is Jacques Donzelot’s best-known book and a crucial point of reference in. In an analysis that adds to the growing debate on tensions between the modern state and the family, Professor Donzelot (Sociology, Nanterre).
|Published (Last):||11 September 2013|
|PDF File Size:||11.54 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||9.45 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
The conjugal bond emerges here as a relationship through which appropriate and inappropriate forms of human life can be assessed.
THE POLICING OF FAMILIES by Jacques Donzelot | Kirkus Reviews
To Donzelot, liberty is the absence of state intervention and in this sense, Passeron was absolutely right in saying that with all this, Donzelot idealised misery and violence as if they stood for some kind popular autonomy. No one since Marx has made a more profound change to the way in which we think about society, power and politics than Foucault. Bourdieu spoke of the general contempt for social workers: His writing is a critically important look back in time that allows a clearer vision of the future of the interrelations of social structures and individual lives.
There are no discussion topics on this book yet. And this ffamilies between Michel Foucault and Esprit would have a significant impact on the French intellectual space.
Amazon Music Stream millions of songs.
Wayne State University Press, Learn more about Amazon Prime. Another example — working-class housing — helps us grasp how urban transformation involved complex, industrial and familial policies. Zhana Xhamila marked it as to-read May 28, Broadsnark marked it as to-read May 10, Just a moment while we sign you in to your Goodreads account. But the focus of his work — on major public institutions — tracks exactly the issues that feminism forced conventionally masculinised social studies to face.
Instead, the evaluation of risks posed by minors replaced the application of legal sentences, and individuals were evaluated for what they were, and not by what they did.
The authors have asserted their rights to be identified as the authors of this work in accordance with the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act Professional expertise and philanthropy provided home aid for families in need, coupled with an investigation into the reality of their needs.
The articles propose very few concrete analyses of professional reality and have the aroma of a global critique of civilisation that was able to serve as a meeting point for Catholics and leftists at that time. Donzelot set himself against discourses that positioned social work as a progressive, scientific response to social problems. No portion of this publication may be reproduced, copied or transmitted save with written permission or in accordance with the provisions of the Copyright, Designs and Patents Actor under the terms of any licence permitting famioies copying issued by the Copyright Licensing Agency, Saffron House, 6—10 Kirby Street, London EC1N 8TS.
Homonationalism in Queer Times Next Wave: Get to Know Us. In the early s, the family is a donzelkt lens for Foucault as he distinguishes between sovereign and disciplinary forms of power, the distinction that will underpin his text Discipline and Punish first pub- lished in French in One pole of medical discourse situated the family as an instrument of population growth to serve the needs of imperalism; the other progressive pole supported abortion and contraception, in line with the discourses of socialists and feminists.
The direct conjunction of Foucault and the family risks the heartbreak of showing our ideals and our safety to have been in ruins all along. Columbia University Press, Armed with medical familiew, bourgeois women rushed to moralise the lives of working-class women, who were held responsible for ensuring that their husbands and children remained at home, a home that would be consolidated by single-family housing imposed on working families in order to control political insubordination through an orderly life.
The first component was a welfare apparatus. Foucault and Donzelot both argued that, during the seventeenth century, philanthropy attempted to contain illegitimate children because of the large public expenditure they caused. Sarah Beth rated it liked it Nov 08, Be the first to discover new talent! Into the void created by destruction of the extended family steps philanthropy: He turned his attentions to the institution of the juvenile court.
famiies Donzelot set out to show that it had little to do with the operation of legal justice, which was not applicable for minors. Playing upon the currency metaphor, Donzelot argues that psychoanalysis does not jjacques any definite plan jafques action but rather allows moral rules “”to float in relation to one another until they find their equilibrium.
Yet, when Donzelot forgets to describe how individuals interact with these structures, he passes from a structuralism of method to a structuralist metaphysics in which the same thing is always reproduced.
And, as a fourth line of argument, Donzelot sees a new alliance emerging between medicine and the state. In presenting this analysis she explains why neoliberal discourses call both for a further liberalisa- tion and a re-moralisation of our lives: Gillian Harkins moves from the history of modern familial relations to an account of the family and politics as they are changing today.
Within and beyond gamilies discourses, we tell ourselves and one another: Remember me on this computer. Review “This is a superb book, an absolutely indispensable book, which cuts through old debates about the family and helps put the whole subject on a new footing.
Public schools, in competition with religious schools in the same way that philanthropy competed with Christian charitywere the core of a series of laws to protect the public health of housing or children. Last accessed 1 December Kyle Quinlan rated it it was amazing Oct 18, Queer Liberalism and the Racialization of Intimacy.