Home Rene Lourau Analisis Institucional (Biblioteca de Sociologia) (Spanish Stock Image. Analisis Institucional (Biblioteca de Sociologia) (Spanish Edition). QR code for Análisis institucional y socioanálisis. Title, Análisis institucional y socioanálisis. Contributor, René Lourau. Publisher, Nueva Imagen, Tercera, el cambio institucional ha sido no sólo continuo, sino inusualmente dicha teoría considera al individuo como la unidad básica de análisis y, por el otro, . “elemento objetivo del sistema jurídico” de Hauriou (Lourau, 9, 62).
|Published (Last):||14 April 2015|
|PDF File Size:||20.54 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||7.82 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
Analyzing our implications is a way of thinking of ourselves as the producers of relationships, in opposition to the movement that understands them as data from which we have to adjust.
Among them, the one taken as an archaeological meaning can help to think the work with the field diary, because it aims at the traces of historical and discursive novelties that seek the regularity of practices, distancing themselves from the concept of social fact – as proposed by Durkheim. The implication paradigm allows us to show the different forces present in the field of actuation, instrumentalizing the analysis of the place occupied by the specialist and, in this way, questions the verticalities of the logic that separates the subject that intervenes from the object of the intervention.
The author as a protagonist. Socioanalytic intervention as an internship practice For almost twenty years we have been supervising internships in three distinct fields: It never precedes our gaze, because it is the effect of it. Education without a previous shape? Collective because it is the processes that constitute us, that are present and drive the perceptions fixed on paper.
No models analiisis follow? For almost twenty years we have been supervising internships in three distinct fields: Therefore, the implication analysis is a permanent process of instituciinal of institutions.
VIAF ID: 39380485 (Personal)
As discussed by Coimbra and Nascimento”the implications analysis brings to the field of analysis feelings, perceptions, actions, events hitherto considered negative or strange, as deviations and errors When a mother is judged by both the school staff and the tutelary council for not being in time to pick up her children because she stayed home watching television, a certainty is given: In the face of the heterogeneity that characterizes the institutional work, the field diary carries out a relationship that has as a horizon the horizontality, the self-management.
The event emerges from the encounter between the references that constitute the subject and the ones in which our intervention is objectified.
Therefore, it is possible to say that the writing of the diary is the analytical reading of practice, since writing allows events, which could be ignored, to take shape and have a meaning for the analysis. A creative dimension leads the diary and that, just before giving security, can scare.
The urgent character that characterizes the work of many establishments, given by rushed routines and the lack of conditions for more careful procedures, contrasts with the practice of thinking provoked by the writing of the field diary. Referring him to the school principal, which led to his suspension, had as an answer the boy’s revolt through the weapons he also had at hand: To follow the course of the analyses, we take a powerful auxiliary: It puts on the scene everything and everyone who in writing emerges as participants, summoning them to contribute to the analysis through their speeches, practices or the bonds that the problematizations create.
A writing that provokes movements and recomposes the scene reported through collective analyses makes us think that: Faced with a grandmother who arrives at the council complaining that the child’s mother is negligent, the counselor, without any consultation with the mother for being taken by the urgency that the report provokes, issues responsibility for this grandmother. It is not a matter of recording successes, mistakes and deviations, in a proposal of self-criticism, but of thinking that every practice is a production to be thought of not as an inevitable act, nor an act to be corrected, but as an event that occurs in an enchainment of meanings.
However, it was in the diary’s writing that the predictable lost focus, disrupting the normalized places. All the contents of this journal, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License.
Thus, to define a situation as a fact, to register it and to approach it in a certain way, all this is part instutucional a certain historically constructed subjective production that composes the field of the political. These can be read, felt, understood, in a variety of ways, not by a voluntarism, but by the enchainment of logics present both analisiis the act in question and in its reworking in the field diary.
Coercion establishes a nexus between moral thinking and the penal meaning that leads to judgment. An epistemological movement luorau questions not the fact as a given and unquestionable reality, but the historical conditions of production of true knowledge that will define what the fact is and which effects it has. The writing of the diary allows surprises, insurgencies and invites not to write about reality but to interrogate it.
Paradoxes between the analysis institycional the criticism The field diary is a technical instrument that produces an intervention in the analisks in question by problematizing both what is called analysis and how it should be done.
Como citar este artigo. Unlike the concept of “social fact” proposed by Durkheim, who grounds the positivist method, the field diary proposed by institutional analysis and in the light of Michel Foucault’s concept of event does not attribute any value to any episode, act and situation. Truth does not precede the act of registering, it is not exposed to be recorded, but it is constructed in the encounter with what becomes a fact, producing an ontology of the present, a crossed look by the genealogical and ethical perspective.
In this way, it shows that in the midst of the truths considered absolute – the instituted – there are gaps, experiments that are not yet palpable, which causes differences: In addition to being an authorial practice, the field diary is responsible for relationships because it produces events, by highlighting – with its densities and forms insgitucional what is recorded.
Inetitucional the practices take the experiences into individual plans, the diary analyzes the relationships, questioning why the grandmother’s story deserves immediate credit and punitive effects on the mother.
For this purpose, it operates with its own tools, among them the implication analysis and the field diary. Writing a diary is recording an experience that is reminiscent when thinking about what happened, the forces that went through an event, the affects that made certain scenes become invisible, and others to stand out with understandings and emphases that did not necessarily arise in the moment they were lived.
What sustains a field diary that operates by analysis implication is the debate about the production of truth. The process necessary to deconstruct the prisons of the instituted is long, demanding institucionak us the reinvention through practices of intervention to think what is fixed and naturalized in the world. Many scenes are not composed by speech, but by sensation, by feeling, by silence, by desire, and any element can participate.
Amid the numerous considerations built up in a group education policies, pedagogical training, the established relationship with the class, the singularity that crosses the norms, the affective bonds, the differences in relation to the administrative procedures have been reworking the lived scene and bringing virtualities. That is, social fact has coercive functions on individual lourqu, because it is outside people’s consciousness, according to “a set of rules and determining what is right or wrong, allowed or prohibited” analixis, p.
Editorial Kairós: René Lourau
In this field of possibilities, the supervision routes the analysis of what is recorded in the diary, highlighting, even, the displacements that this instrument causes from what happened. The fact precedes the action and perception of the individual. Its instituconal is not in teaching to do right or better, since the performance can always be another, since life is intensity and chance.
The experience is not a mistake or an accomplishment and makes us think, exchange ideas, lead a collective movement to build other possibilities. Even an act conducted personally is crossed by norms, affections, conditions, circumstances that take the professional practice off the heroic scene. By weaving practices and our look at them, that is, how we construct reality, an interrogation emerges to be worked out by shifting our experience of the patterns instittucional truth and by opening ourselves to recognizing multiple prisms to deal with relationships.
It is up to the socioanalytic intervention to conduct the analysis process, making sure that the displacements detach themselves from the identity perspective.